JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 10:507-510 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Linden, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilley, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Linden, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilley, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Linden, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gilley, J. R.

Effects of Scheduling Municipal Waste-Water Effluent Irrigation of Reed Canarygrass on Nitrogen Renovation and Grass Production1

D. R. Linden, C. E. Clapp and J. R. Gilley2

ABSTRACT

A 2-year field experiment was conducted to test the performance of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) and the removal of nitrogen from municipal waste-water effluent under varying irrigation schedules. The effluent was obtained from an activated sludge treatment facility that served a domestic suburban population. The 1st-year total application to the 12- by 12-m plots was about 170 cm of effluent containing 320 kg/ha N, primarily in the ammonia form. The 2nd-year application consisted of about 290 cm of effluent containing $30 kg/ha N. Treatments during both years were comprised of 1, 2, or 5 irrigations per week. Results indicated that there was no effect of varying the irrigation schedule on the reed canarygrass yields, which averaged 10.2 and 15.0 metric tons/ha during the 1st and 2nd year, respectively. There also was no effect on soil water N concentrations, which averaged 1.0 and 2.4 mg/liter during the 1st and 2nd year, respectively.

Key Words: soil water • matric potential • crop N uptake • Phalaris arundinacea L.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Soil and Water Management Research Unit, North Central Region, USDA-SEA-AR, in cooperation with the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn.; Scientific Journal Series Paper no. 11235. Research supported in part by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission, St. Paul, Minn.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA-SEA-AR, and Assistant Professor, Dep. of Soil Sci., Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; Research Chemist USDA-SEA-AR, and Professor, Dep. of Soil Sci., Univ. of Minnesota; and Associate Professor, Dep. of Agric. Eng., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, respectively.

Received for publication November 21, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.