JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 10:315-318 (1981)
© 1981 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hesselberg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hesselberg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, L. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hesselberg, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, L. W.

Influence of PCBs in Water on Uptake and Elimination of DDT and DDE by Lake Trout1

Robert J. Hesselberg and Lawrence W. Nicholson2

ABSTRACT

Researchers predicted that several hundred years would be required before DDT (1,1,1 trichloro-2,2-bis [P-chlorophyl] ethane) and its metabolites were likely to decrease to nondetectable levels in Lake Michigan. But following the ban on DDT in 1970, residues of total DDT in Lake Michigan lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) declined rapidly from 10.5 µg/g in 1970 to 5.7 µg/g in 1976. During this period, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were being detected in lake trout tissues at about 20 µg/g. It was hypothesized that the high level of PCBs being accumulated by fish may have influenced uptake and elimination of DDT and DDE (1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis [p-chlorophenyl] ethylene) by fish. To test this hyphophesis, fingeriing lake trout were exposed to various combinations of DDT, DDE (100 ng/liter), and PCBs (100 and 500 ng/liter) in water for 12 weeks. After DDT and DDe exposures were completed, exposure to PCBs was continued for an additional 16 weeks to measure any effect PCBs may have on the elimination of DDT and DDE by fish. Accumulation and elimination rates of DDT and DDE were compared. It was found that PCBs did not influence the accumulation or elimination rates of DDT or DDE in lake trout and therefore should not have had a major influence on the decline of DDT in lake trout.

Key Words: chlorinated hydrocarbons • pollution • pesticides


NOTES

1 Contribution 570 of the Great Lakes Fishery Lab., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., 1451 Green Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48105.

2 Research chemists. The junior author's present address is Dow Chemical Co., Analytical Lab., 574 Building, Midland, MI 48640.

Received for publication September 12, 1980.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.