JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 1:349-352 (1972)
© 1972 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A. S.

Economic Impact of Restricting Herbicide Use1

Austin S. Fox2

ABSTRACT

The economic impact of restricting herbicide use is directly related to their real benefits. Farmer and consumer benefits from using herbicides are associated with the differences between a production function in which herbicides are used to control weeds and a similar but lower function for combinations of alternative weed control practices—not including herbicides. The lower function shows production without herbicides for the same dollar value of alternative resources—primarily land and labor. It also shows the additional dollar value of the alternative resources needed to get the same production when herbicides are not used. The latter is implicit in evaluating costs of restricting specific herbicides while maintaining production. In one study, it was estimated that banning the use of 2,4,5-T on 8 million acres of farm and nonfarm land in 1969 would have increased costs to farmers about $32 million, assuming current levels of production were maintained. However, if substitutes for 2,4,5-T could not include the related phenoxy herbicides, it was estimated that additional costs to farmers as a result of replacing 2,4,5-T would have been $44 million. In a related study it was determined that restricting the use of all phenoxy herbicides would increase United States farmers production costs about $290 million. In addition about 20 million more hours of family labor would be used and about 6 million more crop acres would be required.

Key Words: herbicide economics • farm economics • herbicide bans • herbicide cancellation • phenoxy herbicide bans • 2,4,5-T


NOTES

1 Paper presented Aug. 18, 1971, in New York City at the annual meeting of the ASA as part of the Division C-3 symposium "Fate and Economic Impact of Herbicides."

2 Agricultural Economist, USDA, ERS, Farm Production Economics Div., Washington, D. C. 20250.

Received for publication December 28, 1971.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.